Re: [PATCH for-next 03/10] IB/iser: Don't register memory for all immediatedata writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason and Or,


I'm with Or on this, this is really goofy looking.

This routine probably should not be setting the rkey at all, it makes
no sense to have a routine that returns a lkey and a rkey. Those are
always different flows.

Once that is fixed then the above if can be hoisted to the actual
calling code that needs an rkey, at the point where it does something
different when !iser_always_reg is true..

This change is acceptable to me. However, given that it includes
rework outside the scope of this specific patch which is a performance
regression fix, would it be acceptable to have it incremental and
provide a FIXME comment here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux