On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 07:35 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> >> I pulled that via a bundle from patchworks. I'll double check it.
> > Did you check it out? fixed it out?
>
> I took a look now, you've rebased to-be-rebased/for-4.2 to 4.1-rc4 and
Correct.
> it seems this is what you are going to push into the kernel.org treem
Correct.
> but this series is still there with the zillion tested/reviewed/etc
> signature per one 2-3 patch, I think we've agreed this needs to be
> addressed prior to the upstream push, right?
Incorrect. What you objected to before was the large Cc: list in the
patches. That is gone. What is there now is just the reviewed-by: list
of three people, and the tested-by list of two people. As the entire
patch set as a whole was reviewed and tested by those people, it seems
accurate to me.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
