On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:59:16PM -0700, Nelson, Shannon wrote: > On 3/13/2025 5:48 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 01:30:52PM +0100, David Ahern wrote: > > > > > So that means 3 different vendors and 3 different devices looking for a > > > similar auxbus based hierarchy with a core driver not buried within one > > > of the subsystems. > > > > > > I guess at this point we just need to move forward with the proposal and > > > start sending patches. > > > > > > Seems like drivers/core is the consensus for the core driver? > > > > Yes, anything that is not aux_core is fine by me. > > > > drivers/core or drivers/aux. > > Between the two of these I prefer drivers/core - I don't want to see this > tied to aux for the same reasons we don't want it tied to pci or net. Decades ago we tried to add drivers/core/ but I think tools really didn't like to see "core" as a directory name. Hopefully you all don't run into that issue here as well :) Anyway, if you all want me to run that tree as a "neutral" third-party, I'll be glad to do so. thanks, greg k-h
