On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:37:36 +0000 Omer Shpigelman <oshpigelman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Is there any reason in particular to call netif_receive_skb instead of > > napi_gro_receive ? > > > > As you can see, we also support polling mode which is a non-NAPI flow. > We could use napi_gro_receive() for NAPI flow and netif_receive_skb() for > polling mode but we don't support RX checksum offload anyway. Why non-NAPI? I thought current netdev policy was all drivers should use NAPI.
