Hi Bernard,
On 12/1/23 02:09, Bernard Metzler wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 4:24 AM
To: Bernard Metzler <BMT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; jgg@xxxxxxxx; leon@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH 3/4] RDMA/siw: Set qp_state in siw_query_qp
Run test_query_rc_qp against siw failed since siw didn't set qp_state
accordingly. To address it, introduce siw_qp_state_to_ib_qp_state
which convert SIW_QP_STATE_IDLE to IB_QPS_INIT which is similar as
in cxgb4.
rdma-core# ./build/bin/run_tests.py --dev siw0
tests.test_qp.QPTest.test_query_rc_qp -v
test_query_rc_qp (tests.test_qp.QPTest)
Queries an RC QP after creation. Verifies that its properties are as ...
FAIL
======================================================================
FAIL: test_query_rc_qp (tests.test_qp.QPTest)
Queries an RC QP after creation. Verifies that its properties are as
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/gjiang/rdma-core/tests/test_qp.py", line 284, in
test_query_rc_qp
self.query_qp_common_test(e.IBV_QPT_RC)
File "/home/gjiang/rdma-core/tests/test_qp.py", line 265, in
query_qp_common_test
self.verify_qp_attrs(caps, e.IBV_QPS_INIT, qp_init_attr, qp_attr)
File "/home/gjiang/rdma-core/tests/test_qp.py", line 239, in
verify_qp_attrs
self.assertEqual(state, attr.qp_state)
AssertionError: <ibv_qp_state.IBV_QPS_INIT: 1> != 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.057s
FAILED (failures=1)
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Very nice finding! How could that remain undetected.
Probably no real application checks QP state 😉
My guess is no one run the test after the commit 😉.
698f2ae80476 tests: Fix comparing qp_state for iWARP providers.
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
index dca6a155523d..233985434cfd 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
@@ -19,6 +19,15 @@
#include "siw_verbs.h"
#include "siw_mem.h"
+static int siw_qp_state_to_ib_qp_state[IB_QPS_ERR] = {
You may better use SIW_QP_STATE_COUNT for the size
of the array
Right, fully agree, will change it in next version after you finish
review this version.
Thanks,
Guoqing