Re: [PATCH 4/4] lib/cpumask: don't mention for_each_numa_hop_mask in cpumask_local_spread()"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:48 PM Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/24/2023 7:05 PM, Yury Norov wrote:
> > Now that for_each_numa_hop_mask() is reverted, also revert reference to
> > it in the comment to cpumask_local_spread().
> >
> > This partially reverts commit 2ac4980c57f5 ("lib/cpumask: update comment
> > for cpumask_local_spread()")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Interesting to see both sign-offs here. Not sure what that implies here
> since both represent you :)
>
> Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the review, Jacob. The 2nd sign-off is nothing interesting,
just bureaucracy.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux