Re: [PATCH net-next] page_pool: split types and declarations from page_pool.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 18:42:17 +0200

> From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 20:13:37 +0800
> 
>> Split types and pure function declarations from page_pool.h
>> and add them in page_page_types.h, so that C sources can
>> include page_pool.h and headers should generally only include
>> page_pool_types.h as suggested by jakub.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Nice!
> 
> Let me take it into my tree, I assume it's safe to say it will be
> accepted sooner than my patches :D

FYI: it's already there (since yesterday), including your hybrid
allocation series, so for the next revision you could take it from there
to not rebase it one more time :)
...except that seems like I have to rebase it once again now that you
change the patch to add new folder as Jakub asked.

(it's still the same iavf-pp-frag)

> 
> BTW, what do you think: is it better to have those two includes in the
> root include/net/ folder or do something like
> 
> include/net/page_pool/
>   * types.h
>   * <some meaningful name>.h (let's say driver.h)
> 
> like it's done e.g. for GPIO (see include/linux/gpio/)?
> 
> Thanks,
> Olek

Thanks,
Olek



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux