Re: [PATCH 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Fix the error "trying to register non-static key in rxe_cleanup_task"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2023/4/4 13:58, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 08:13:22AM +0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
在 2023/4/4 2:10, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 10:44:17AM +0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>

In the function rxe_create_qp(), rxe_qp_from_init() is called to
initialize qp, internally things like rxe_init_task are not setup until
rxe_qp_init_req().

If an error occures before this point then the unwind will call
rxe_cleanup() and eventually to rxe_qp_do_cleanup()/rxe_cleanup_task()
which will oops when trying to access the uninitialized spinlock.

If rxe_init_task is not executed, rxe_cleanup_task will not be called.

Reported-by: syzbot+cfcc1a3c85be15a40cba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=fd85757b74b3eb59f904138486f755f71e090df8

Fixes: 8700e3e7c485 ("Soft RoCE driver")
Fixes: 2d4b21e0a291 ("IB/rxe: Prevent from completer to operate on non valid QP")
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c
index ab72db68b58f..7856c02c1b46 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_qp.c
@@ -176,6 +176,10 @@ static void rxe_qp_init_misc(struct rxe_dev *rxe, struct rxe_qp *qp,
   	spin_lock_init(&qp->rq.producer_lock);
   	spin_lock_init(&qp->rq.consumer_lock);
+	memset(&qp->req.task, 0, sizeof(struct rxe_task));
+	memset(&qp->comp.task, 0, sizeof(struct rxe_task));
+	memset(&qp->resp.task, 0, sizeof(struct rxe_task));
IMHO QP is already zeroed here.
Sure. Exactly. Here I just confirm that req.task, comp.task and resp.task
are zeroed explicitly.
There is no need to do so. It is quite misleading to read the code and
see these memset() functions as they give false impression that QP is
not zeroed.

I will remove these memset function in the latest commit.

Thanks,

Zhu Yanjun


If you think it had better remove these memset functions, I will follow your
advice.
Yes, please.

Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux