On 02 Feb 20:03, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:54:53AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 13:44:05 -0400 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > You don't remember me trying to convince you to keep the RoCE stuff
> > away from our open source IPsec implementation?
>
> Huh? What does this:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1673960981.git.leon@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Have to do with IPsec?
Dunno. But I don't know what it has to do with the PR we're commenting
on either..
It has to do, because I need shared branch to put net/mlx5 patches from
that "special keys" series and I patiently waited for any response.
Hi Jakub, in a nutshell, my PR adds the steering rules needed for ipsec
RoCE purely in mlx5 only, ipsec tables are shared between netdev and rdma
It's a reality that mlx5_core is serving both netdev and rdma, it's not
about who has the keys for approving, it's that the fact the mlx5_core is
not just a netdev driver, this is true for all vendors who serve both
worlds it's not just mlx5.
