On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:26:25PM -0600, Bob Pearson wrote: > On 1/12/23 21:43, kernel test robot wrote: > > Hi Bob, > > > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > > > [auto build test ERROR on bd99ede8ef2dc03e29a181b755ba4f78da2644e6] > > > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bob-Pearson/RDMA-rxe-Cleanup-mr_check_range/20230113-082406 > > base: bd99ede8ef2dc03e29a181b755ba4f78da2644e6 > > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113002116.457324-5-rpearsonhpe%40gmail.com > > patch subject: [PATCH for-next v2 4/6] RDMA-rxe: Isolate mr code from atomic_write_reply() > > config: powerpc-allmodconfig > > compiler: powerpc-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0 > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/c7e5c2723da0d6b13e37cbff63dad653e5c8801c > > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux > > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Bob-Pearson/RDMA-rxe-Cleanup-mr_check_range/20230113-082406 > > git checkout c7e5c2723da0d6b13e37cbff63dad653e5c8801c > > # save the config file > > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config > > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=powerpc olddefconfig > > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=powerpc SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/ > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > In file included from <command-line>: > > drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c: In function 'rxe_mr_do_atomic_write': > >>> include/linux/compiler_types.h:358:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_870' declared with attribute error: Need native word sized stores/loads for atomicity. > > Jason, > Does this mean that powerpc doesn't support u64 as a native type? Perhaps this is > why the Fujitsu folks used CONFIG_64BIT in the atomic write patch which seemed a > little strange. Yes and yes Jason