On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 10:26:33PM +0800, Yanjun Zhu wrote: > > 在 2022/10/6 20:53, Leon Romanovsky 写道: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 03:25:00PM +0800, Yanjun Zhu wrote: > > > 在 2022/9/28 14:04, Leon Romanovsky 写道: > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 06:58:50PM +0800, Yanjun Zhu wrote: > > > > > 在 2022/9/27 18:34, Leon Romanovsky 写道: > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 10:40:33PM -0400, yanjun.zhu@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> > > <...> > > > > > Is it better to append "exclusive" or "shared" in the end of the line? > > No, exclusive/shared is global property, applied to all links. > > OK. > > When running "rdma link show", there is no difference between shared and > exclusive. > > Is it acceptable? exclusive/shared is ib_core module parameter, so or all links are shared or all links are exclusive. They can't be both at the same time. > > > And in exclusive mode, a rdma link that can not be accessed in net namespace > A still > > appears in net namespace A when running "rdma link show" in net namespace A. > > The above is different from others in net namespace. > > For example, in net namespace, if net device NIC0 is moved to net namespace > B from net namespace A, > > this NIC0 will not appear in net namespace A when running "ip link" command > in net namespace A. > > Is it a problem? rdmatool presents IB devices. It has no logic that decides if that device is usable/operable or not. Thanks > > > Zhu Yanjun > > > > > Thanks
