在 2022/10/6 20:53, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 03:25:00PM +0800, Yanjun Zhu wrote:
在 2022/9/28 14:04, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 06:58:50PM +0800, Yanjun Zhu wrote:
在 2022/9/27 18:34, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 10:40:33PM -0400, yanjun.zhu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
<...>
Is it better to append "exclusive" or "shared" in the end of the line?
No, exclusive/shared is global property, applied to all links.
OK.
When running "rdma link show", there is no difference between shared and
exclusive.
Is it acceptable?
And in exclusive mode, a rdma link that can not be accessed in net
namespace A still
appears in net namespace A when running "rdma link show" in net namespace A.
The above is different from others in net namespace.
For example, in net namespace, if net device NIC0 is moved to net
namespace B from net namespace A,
this NIC0 will not appear in net namespace A when running "ip link"
command in net namespace A.
Is it a problem?
Zhu Yanjun
Thanks
