On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 09:11:25AM -0400, Tom Talpey wrote: > With your change, ERDMA will pre-emptively fail such a newly posted > request, and generate no new completion. The consumer is left in limbo > on the status of its prior requests. Providers must not override this. Yeah, I tend to agree with Tom. And I also want to point out that Linux RDMA verbs does not follow the SW specifications of either IBTA or the iWarp group. We have our own expectation for how these APIs work that our own ULPs rely on. So pedantically debating what a software spec we don't follow says is not relavent. The utility is to understand the intention and use cases and ensure we cover the same. Usually this means we follow the spec :) Jason
