On 18/08/22 22:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 8:18 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:26:43 +0100 >> Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > How about: >> >> > >> > find the next set bit in (*addr1 & ~*addr2) >> >> I understand the above better. But to convert that into English, we could >> say: >> >> >> Find the next bit in *addr1 excluding all the bits in *addr2. >> >> or >> >> Find the next bit in *addr1 that is not set in *addr2. > > With this explanation I'm wondering how different this is to > bitmap_bitremap(), with adjusting to using an inverted mask. If they > have something in common, perhaps make them in the same namespace with > similar naming convention? > I'm trying to wrap my head around the whole remap thing, IIUC we could have something like remap *addr1 to ~*addr2 and stop rather than continue with a wraparound, but that really feels like shoehorning. > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko
