On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 8:18 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:26:43 +0100 > Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > How about: > > > > > find the next set bit in (*addr1 & ~*addr2) > > I understand the above better. But to convert that into English, we could > say: > > > Find the next bit in *addr1 excluding all the bits in *addr2. > > or > > Find the next bit in *addr1 that is not set in *addr2. With this explanation I'm wondering how different this is to bitmap_bitremap(), with adjusting to using an inverted mask. If they have something in common, perhaps make them in the same namespace with similar naming convention? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
