On 18/08/22 17:43, Valentin Schneider wrote: > On 18/08/22 09:28, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: >> On 8/17/2022 10:58 AM, Valentin Schneider wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Tariq pointed out in [1] that drivers allocating IRQ vectors would benefit >>> from having smarter NUMA-awareness (cpumask_local_spread() doesn't quite cut >>> it). >>> >>> The proposed interface involved an array of CPUs and a temporary cpumask, and >>> being my difficult self what I'm proposing here is an interface that doesn't >>> require any temporary storage other than some stack variables (at the cost of >>> one wild macro). >>> >>> Patch 5/5 is just there to showcase how the thing would be used. If this doesn't >>> get hated on, I'll let Tariq pick this up and push it with his networking driver >>> changes (with actual changelogs). >> >> I am interested in this work, but it seems that at least on lore and in >> my inbox, patch 3,4,5 didn't show up. > > I used exactly the same git send-email command for this than for v1 (which > shows up in its entirety on lore), but I can't see these either. I'm going > to assume they got lost and will resend them. Welp, it's there now, but clearly should've used --no-thread when resending them :/
