On 18/08/22 09:28, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > On 8/17/2022 10:58 AM, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Tariq pointed out in [1] that drivers allocating IRQ vectors would benefit >> from having smarter NUMA-awareness (cpumask_local_spread() doesn't quite cut >> it). >> >> The proposed interface involved an array of CPUs and a temporary cpumask, and >> being my difficult self what I'm proposing here is an interface that doesn't >> require any temporary storage other than some stack variables (at the cost of >> one wild macro). >> >> Patch 5/5 is just there to showcase how the thing would be used. If this doesn't >> get hated on, I'll let Tariq pick this up and push it with his networking driver >> changes (with actual changelogs). > > I am interested in this work, but it seems that at least on lore and in > my inbox, patch 3,4,5 didn't show up. I used exactly the same git send-email command for this than for v1 (which shows up in its entirety on lore), but I can't see these either. I'm going to assume they got lost and will resend them.
