Re: [PATCH for-next v7 12/12] RDMA/erdma: Add driver to kernel build environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 5/16/22 3:11 PM, Cheng Xu wrote:


On 5/16/22 11:40 AM, Cheng Xu wrote:


On 5/10/22 9:18 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 03:17:47PM +0800, Cheng Xu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Cheng Xu <chengyou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/Kconfig b/drivers/infiniband/Kconfig
index 33d3ce9c888e..cc6a7ff88ff3 100644
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/Kconfig
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ source "drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/Kconfig"
  source "drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/Kconfig"
  source "drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/Kconfig"
  source "drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/Kconfig"
+source "drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/Kconfig"
  source "drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/Kconfig"
  source "drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/Kconfig"
  source "drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/Kconfig"

keep sorted


OK, I thought the order follows the rule: "comes first, appears first",
so I add our drivers to the tail of "drivers/infiniband/hw/..."

Since the current list is not sorted, and if it should be, I will fix
this in next version.

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile b/drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile
index fba0b3be903e..6b3a88046125 100644
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INFINIBAND_HFI1)        += hfi1/
  obj-$(CONFIG_INFINIBAND_HNS)        += hns/
  obj-$(CONFIG_INFINIBAND_QEDR)        += qedr/
  obj-$(CONFIG_INFINIBAND_BNXT_RE)    += bnxt_re/
+obj-$(CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ERDMA)        += erdma/
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/Kconfig b/drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c90f2be1ea63
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+config INFINIBAND_ERDMA
+    tristate "Alibaba Elastic RDMA Adapter (ERDMA) support"
+    depends on PCI_MSI && 64BIT && !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN

Why !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN? That is usually not OK.

we want use !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to disable the erdma compilation on big
endian machine, because we only have little endian machines, and
don't support big endian machines. I have no idea why it is usually not
OK, could you explain it any more?

Thanks

Did you run sparse on this?


No, I will check this. I think this may be OK, because EFA also use
!CPU_BIG_ENDIAN in the same way.


...... Is
cleaning the warnings necessary for upstream? If so, I will work on it.

Please ignore this, it seems easy to clean the warnings, I will fix
them any way.

Thanks,
Cheng Xu



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux