On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:26:15 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote: > >> How many did you fix? > > > > Strange, I thought coccinelle does pretty well on checkpatch compliance. > > It does, but the problem is there is no obvious place to break > > long_function_name(another_long_function_name(and_some_variable))) > > without introducing a variable. Makes sense now. > >> If it still applies cleanly, i would just apply it. > > > > It seems to apply but does not build (missing include in mlx4?) > > Hmm. I tried to determine if the correct headers were included, but it > looks like there was an error there. In any case, it seems like David > fixed it up when he applied it. Ah, you're right! He noted: Add missing linux/mii.h include to mellanox. -DaveM I thought this was not applied since it was marked as "Not applicable" in patchwork. Let me fix that to say "Accepted".