On 6/7/2021 11:41 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:50:20PM -0500, Pearson, Robert B wrote:
sorry/this time without the HTML.
======================================================================
ERROR: test_qp_ex_rc_bind_mw (tests.test_qpex.QpExTestCase)
Verify bind memory window operation using the new post_send API.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/rpearson/src/rdma-core/tests/test_qpex.py", line 292, in
test_qp_ex_rc_bind_mw
u.poll_cq(server.cq)
File "/home/rpearson/src/rdma-core/tests/utils.py", line 538, in poll_cq
raise PyverbsRDMAError('Completion status is {s}'.
pyverbs.pyverbs_error.PyverbsRDMAError: Completion status is Memory window
bind error. Errno: 6, No such device or address
This test attempts to bind a type 2 MW to an MR that does not have bind mw
access set and expects the test to succeed.
Does the test break after your MW series? Or will it break not-merged
code yet?
Generally speaking, we expect that developers run rdma-core tests and
fixed/extend them prior to the submission.
Thanks
Bob Pearson
Nope. I don't have real RNICs at home to test. But (see my note to Zhu)
the non extended APIs do set the access flags correctly and the extended
test case does not. The wr_bind_mw() function can't fix this for the
test case. It has to set the access flags when it creates the MR and it
didn't. It is possible that mlx5 doesn't check the bind access flag but
that seems unlikely.
Bob
