There are some odd mismatches in field and access index. These may be simple cut/paste typos. Are these intentional? ip4txfrag is set to the value from IP4RXFRAGS 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1753) gather_stats->ip4txfrag = 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1754) rd64(dev->hw, 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1755) dev->hw_stats_regs_64[IRDMA_HW_STAT_INDEX_IP4RXFRAGS] 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1756) + stats_inst_offset_64); ip4txfrag is set again a few lines later, so the case above is probably a defect. 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1769) gather_stats->ip4txfrag = 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1770) rd64(dev->hw, 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1771) dev->hw_stats_regs_64[IRDMA_HW_STAT_INDEX_IP4TXFRAGS] 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1772) + stats_inst_offset_64); And here ip6txfrag is set to the value of IP6RXFRAGS 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1785) gather_stats->ip6txfrags = 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1786) rd64(dev->hw, 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1787) dev->hw_stats_regs_64[IRDMA_HW_STAT_INDEX_IP6RXFRAGS] 915cc7ac0f8e2a (Mustafa Ismail 2021-06-02 15:51:34 -0500 1788) + stats_inst_offset_64);