Re: Banyan Vines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----Original Message-----
From: James Carlson [mailto:carlsonj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 03:09 PM
To: 'Michael St. Laurent'
Cc: tony.chamberlain@xxxxxxxxx, linux-ppp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Banyan Vines

Michael St. Laurent writes:
> Might it not also be that the client connecting has the Banyan Vines
> protocol installed?

That's probably _really_ unlikely in 2008.  ;-}

Plus, the original poster noted that he had this:

> > > (along with a lot of unsupported protocol messages which are just
> > > hex values), or what to do about it?

That almost certainly makes Banyan Vines a red herring.  We just
happened to see a corrupted packet that started with hex 35 or 00 35.

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <carlsonj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

========================
Especially since the VPN had been working (with mmpe or is it mppe?) for
6 or 7 months.

Could it be hackers?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux for Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux