Re: LCP Renegotiates After IP Connection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Unruh writes:

> > If you read section 5.1 ("Configure-Request") of RFC 1661, it
> > discusses how the Identifier is chosen, and explains that
> > implementations are permitted to leave the ID field unchanged.
> > Retransmit can be exactly that: retransmit, don't generate a new one
> > from scratch.  That's how pppd does it.
> 
> Can be. But why make it so.

The main reason I made it like this is that this way, it has some
chance of working on a link where the round-trip latency is more than
the retransmit interval.

> Then I would follow that. Agreed. But it could have been "We just purchased
> 5000 of those things at a really cheap non-returnable deal. You better make
> them work."

Then you hack pppd for that particular situation (you have the source,
after all), but you don't pretend that your hack is necessarily a good
thing for everyone to use.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux for Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux