Bill Unruh writes: > > If you read section 5.1 ("Configure-Request") of RFC 1661, it > > discusses how the Identifier is chosen, and explains that > > implementations are permitted to leave the ID field unchanged. > > Retransmit can be exactly that: retransmit, don't generate a new one > > from scratch. That's how pppd does it. > > Can be. But why make it so. The main reason I made it like this is that this way, it has some chance of working on a link where the round-trip latency is more than the retransmit interval. > Then I would follow that. Agreed. But it could have been "We just purchased > 5000 of those things at a really cheap non-returnable deal. You better make > them work." Then you hack pppd for that particular situation (you have the source, after all), but you don't pretend that your hack is necessarily a good thing for everyone to use. Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html