On 08/22/2013 11:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:20 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: >> But if having cpuidle backend-driver separately for other powerpc arcs >> makes sense such that each one have their own state information etc >> then it makes sense to name the files as cpuidle-power.c, >> cpuilde-ppc32.c and so on. > > If by "power" you mean IBM POWER machines/CPUs, then make it > cpuidle-ibm-power or cpuidle-book3s64 maybe to clarify what families it > affects. Sure. Thanks :) Regards, Deepthi > Cheers > Ben. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev > >
