On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:20 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote: > But if having cpuidle backend-driver separately for other powerpc arcs > makes sense such that each one have their own state information etc > then it makes sense to name the files as cpuidle-power.c, > cpuilde-ppc32.c and so on. If by "power" you mean IBM POWER machines/CPUs, then make it cpuidle-ibm-power or cpuidle-book3s64 maybe to clarify what families it affects. Cheers Ben.
