On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:51 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 9 November 2012 09:21, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 11:56 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> >> On 8 November 2012 11:31, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:56 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> >> >> This modification adds 2 new thermal trend type THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL
> >> >> and THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL. This thermal trend can be used to quickly
> >> >> jump to the upper or lower cooling level instead of incremental increase
> >> >> or decrease.
> >> >
> >> > IMO, what we need is a new more aggressive cooling governor which always
> >> > uses upper limit when the temperature is raising and lower limit when
> >> > the temperature is dropping.
> >> Yes I agree that a new aggressive governor is the best approach but
> >> then i thought adding a new trend type is a simple solution to achieve
> >> this and since most of the governor logic might be same as the
> >> step-wise governor. I have no objection in doing it through governor.
> >> >
> > hmmm,
> > I think a more proper way is to set the cooling state to upper limit
> > when it overheats and reduce the cooling state step by step when the
> > temperature drops.
>
> No actually I was thinking of having a simple governor with a feature
> like it only sets to upper level and lower level. Also since the
> temperature sensor is capable of interrupting for both increase in
> threshold(say 100C) and fall in threshold (say 90C), so polling or
> step increments is not needed at all.
> Currently stepwise governor governor does that so we might change the
> macro name as,
> THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_STEP,
> THERMAL_TREND_DROP_STEP,
> THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_MAX,
> THERMAL_TREND_DROP_MAX,
>
> and file step_wise.c can be named as state_wise.c or trend_wise.c.
>
> I am not sure if it is the best way . How do you feel ?
>
this sounds good to me.
I'd like to see Durga' comments on this as well.
thanks,
rui
> > what do you think?
> >
> > thanks,
> > rui
> >
> >> > I can write such a governor if you do not have time to.
> >> ok. thanks
> >> >
> >> > thanks,
> >> > rui
> >> >> This is needed for temperature sensors which support rising/falling
> >> >> threshold interrupts and polling can be totally avoided.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> drivers/thermal/step_wise.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> >> >> include/linux/thermal.h | 2 ++
> >> >> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> >> >> index 1242cff..0d2d8d6 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> >> >> @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@
> >> >> * state for this trip point
> >> >> * b. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING, use lower cooling
> >> >> * state for this trip point
> >> >> + * c. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL, use highest cooling
> >> >> + * state for this trip point
> >> >> + * d. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL, use lowest cooling
> >> >> + * state for this trip point
> >> >> */
> >> >> static unsigned long get_target_state(struct thermal_instance *instance,
> >> >> enum thermal_trend trend)
> >> >> @@ -50,7 +54,10 @@ static unsigned long get_target_state(struct thermal_instance *instance,
> >> >> } else if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING) {
> >> >> cur_state = cur_state > instance->lower ?
> >> >> (cur_state - 1) : instance->lower;
> >> >> - }
> >> >> + } else if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL)
> >> >> + cur_state = instance->upper;
> >> >> + else if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL)
> >> >> + cur_state = instance->lower;
> >> >>
> >> >> return cur_state;
> >> >> }
> >> >> @@ -87,7 +94,8 @@ static void update_instance_for_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> static void update_instance_for_dethrottle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> >> >> - int trip, enum thermal_trip_type trip_type)
> >> >> + int trip, enum thermal_trip_type trip_type,
> >> >> + enum thermal_trend trend)
> >> >> {
> >> >> struct thermal_instance *instance;
> >> >> struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> >> >> @@ -101,7 +109,10 @@ static void update_instance_for_dethrottle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> >> >> cdev = instance->cdev;
> >> >> cdev->ops->get_cur_state(cdev, &cur_state);
> >> >>
> >> >> - instance->target = cur_state > instance->lower ?
> >> >> + if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL)
> >> >> + instance->target = instance->lower;
> >> >> + else
> >> >> + instance->target = cur_state > instance->lower ?
> >> >> (cur_state - 1) : THERMAL_NO_TARGET;
> >> >>
> >> >> /* Deactivate a passive thermal instance */
> >> >> @@ -133,7 +144,7 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> >> >> if (tz->temperature >= trip_temp)
> >> >> update_instance_for_throttle(tz, trip, trip_type, trend);
> >> >> else
> >> >> - update_instance_for_dethrottle(tz, trip, trip_type);
> >> >> + update_instance_for_dethrottle(tz, trip, trip_type, trend);
> >> >>
> >> >> mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> >> >> }
> >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> >> >> index 807f214..8bce3ec 100644
> >> >> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> >> >> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> >> >> @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ enum thermal_trend {
> >> >> THERMAL_TREND_STABLE, /* temperature is stable */
> >> >> THERMAL_TREND_RAISING, /* temperature is raising */
> >> >> THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING, /* temperature is dropping */
> >> >> + THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL, /* Apply highest cooling action*/
> >> >> + THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL, /* Apply lowest cooling action*/
> >> >> };
> >> >>
> >> >> /* Events supported by Thermal Netlink */
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
