Hello, Brian. On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:41:45PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > > If you have some time, it would be nice to introduce > > ata_platform_remove_one(). There's no reason to have that implemented > > separately in each driver. > > OK, I think I have a pretty good set of patches. I have about 8 > drivers switched over to a new ata_platform_remove_one(). Should I > submit it with my resend of this series? I think both ways should be fine. > > It would also be nice to move > > remove_one()'s to some higher level port_ops so that individual > > drivers don't have to specify them explicitly. > > Hmm, which port op would you recommend? host_stop()? Or a new remove_one() op? Heh, that was me being confused. Please disregard. I for some reason thought .remove is an ata operation. :) Thanks. -- tejun
