On Wednesday, January 11, 2012, Antti P Miettinen wrote: > Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > There are case where the constraints values should be additive. The > > best example is the main memory throughput and so the memory > > controller frequency (or the L3 frequency on OMAP). The main problem > > is to estimate the overhead of multiple simultaneous transfers. > > > > What do you think? > > This is a valid point. What tree/branch should I look at for the OMAP L3 > PM QoS? > > I think for CPU performance, it's probably simplest just to use > frequency. Mapping from GOPS/MIPS/FLOPS/FPS is probably more sensily > done by PM QoS client side. Well, unfortunately, frequency is kind of system-specific. I mean, you need to know what frequencies are supported/available to use that, so it would require the potential users to know the CPU internals. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
