Re: [PATCH 0/6] RFC: CPU frequency min/max as PM QoS params

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> There are case where the constraints values should be additive. The
> best example is the main memory throughput and so the memory
> controller frequency (or the L3 frequency on OMAP). The main problem
> is to estimate the overhead of multiple simultaneous transfers.
>
> What do you think?

This is a valid point. What tree/branch should I look at for the OMAP L3
PM QoS?

I think for CPU performance, it's probably simplest just to use
frequency. Mapping from GOPS/MIPS/FLOPS/FPS is probably more sensily
done by PM QoS client side.

	--Antti

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux