On Wednesday, May 04, 2011, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > --- On Tue, 3/5/11, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hmm. I'd rather use mutex_trylock() and call try_to_freeze() if > > > > that fails. > > > > > > > > Is there anything wrong with this approach? > > > > > > Well, mutex_trylock() doesn't wait if it cannot acquire the mutex, so > > > won't the calling process enter a busy loop if it fails? > > > > Right. So I don't see how we could do better that in your patch at the > > moment. > > Right, neither do I. > > > I'm not sure if Jiri is going to take your patch. I will if he doesn't. > > I can add drivers/char/apm-emulation.c as the one maintained under the > 'APM' roof, and take this, no problem. > > Rafael, I take it that I can add your Ack to this patch, right? That's correct. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
