On Tuesday, May 03, 2011, Paul Parsons wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > --- On Tue, 3/5/11, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hmm. I'd rather use mutex_trylock() and call try_to_freeze() if > > that fails. > > > > Is there anything wrong with this approach? > > Well, mutex_trylock() doesn't wait if it cannot acquire the mutex, so won't the calling process enter a busy loop if it fails? Right. So I don't see how we could do better that in your patch at the moment. I'm not sure if Jiri is going to take your patch. I will if he doesn't. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm