Re: [PATCH 0/9] PM: Rework shmobile and OMAP runtime PM using power domains (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:30:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Taking the feedback from the last version of the patchset into account
> I reworked patches [7/9] and [8/9] so that multiple clocks can be used for
> runtime PM.  I also fixed a couple of build issues (the patches have been
> built for x86, ARM/shmobile and ARM/OMAP1).
> 
> On Sunday, April 17, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The following series of patches is my attempt to consolidate the shmobile and
> > OMAP runtime PM code using power domains so that it is not necessary to
> > replace the platform bus type's runtime PM callbacks any more.
> > 
> > Some of the patches have already been posted, some are new and some are
> > from Kevin. :-)
> 
> The high-level description of what the patches do hasn't changed, so:
> 
> [1/9] - Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones
>         (this one has been discussed already).
> 
> [2/9] - Export the platform bus type's default PM callbacks so that they
>         can be used in power domain objects.
> 
> [3/9] - Use a default power domain for runtime PM on shmobile (both ARM
>         and SH flavors) instead of replacing the platform bus type's
>         runtime PM callbacks (using __weak).
> 
> [4/9] - Use generic runtime PM callbacks directly in the platform bus type.
> 
> [5/9] - Move OMAP2 runtime PM implementation to using a power domain object
>         (patch from Kevin rebased on top of [1-4/9]).
> 
> [6/9] - Add subsystem data field to struct dev_pm_info.
> 
> [7/9] - Introduce generic clock manipulation routines for runtime PM and
>         convert ARM shmobile to using them.
> 
> [8/9] - Move OMAP1 runtime PM to the new core infrastructure.
> 
> [9/9] - Remove platform_bus_set_pm_ops() (patch from Kevin).
> 
> If there are no objections (or reports of breakage), I'd like to push these
> patches through the suspend-2.6 tree in the 2.6.40 merge window.

No objections from me at all, looks great, thanks for doing this.

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux