On Friday, February 18, 2011, Rabin Vincent wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 23:58, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Friday, February 18, 2011, Rabin Vincent wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 20:55, Rabin Vincent <rabin@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> > This will solve the platform vs AMBA bus, but shouldn't we really be > >> > aiming for consistent behaviour between these and the other busses such > >> > as I2C and SPI, which are also usually commonly used on the same > >> > platforms and are using GENERIC_PM_OPS? > >> > > >> > Should we be auditing all platform drivers and then switch platform to > >> > the GENERIC_PM_OPS? > >> > > >> > Or should the two points (1) and (2) be not handled in the bus at all > >> > and be left to individual drivers (in which case we should audit i2c and > >> > spi and change GENERIC_PM_OPS)? > >> > >> How about something like the below? If we have something like this, we > >> can just switch platform to GENERIC_PM_OPS and add the > >> pm_runtime_want_interaction() (or something better named) call to the > >> i2c and spi drivers using runtime PM. > > > > Why don't we make platform_bus_type behave along the lines of generic ops > > instead? > > At least drivers/spi/omap2_mcspi.c, drivers/video/sh_mobile_lcdcfb.c and > drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c are some pm_runtime-using drivers which seem > to do different things in their runtime vs normal suspend/resume > routines, so forcing platform into the active-on-resume behaviour of the > generic ops may make some use cases impossible. Conversion of more OMAP > drivers to runtime pm appears to be ongoing so I'd imagine we'd be > seeing more of this. Perhaps Kevin or Magnus will have a comment here. > The same thing applies to AMBA drivers. I see. > Looking at the i2c drivers using runtime pm in comparison, they all seem > to be using straightforward UNIVERSAL_PM_OPS-style code with the runtime > and the system sleep doing the same things. So maybe we do need to > treat platform/AMBA different from the I2C/SPI group? We probably do. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
