On Friday, February 18, 2011, Rabin Vincent wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 20:55, Rabin Vincent <rabin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > This will solve the platform vs AMBA bus, but shouldn't we really be > > aiming for consistent behaviour between these and the other busses such > > as I2C and SPI, which are also usually commonly used on the same > > platforms and are using GENERIC_PM_OPS? > > > > Should we be auditing all platform drivers and then switch platform to > > the GENERIC_PM_OPS? > > > > Or should the two points (1) and (2) be not handled in the bus at all > > and be left to individual drivers (in which case we should audit i2c and > > spi and change GENERIC_PM_OPS)? > > How about something like the below? If we have something like this, we > can just switch platform to GENERIC_PM_OPS and add the > pm_runtime_want_interaction() (or something better named) call to the > i2c and spi drivers using runtime PM. Why don't we make platform_bus_type behave along the lines of generic ops instead? Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
