On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:53:52AM -0800, Tim Bird wrote: > On 02/09/2011 11:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Not really, the goal was to simplify the PM config options to ones that > > are actually useful and cut down on the number of silly combinations > > that the randconfigs turn up. CONFIG_PM is there mostly for historical > > reasons, it doesn't really mean much by itself except as a gate to other > > options. > I'm confused. Do you plan to retain the option to > turn off PM features completely, or not? I thought that's > what CONFIG_PM did today. Raphael's patches do that in a much better way than my original patch, my original patch would have force CONFIG_PM on but still allowed all the PM features that it controls to be turned on and off individually. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
