On 02/09/2011 11:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:00:17AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote: > >> and my understanding of this proposal was a goal to remove the ability >> to have CONFIG_PM disabled, which results in increased memory usage >> for some configurations. > > Not really, the goal was to simplify the PM config options to ones that > are actually useful and cut down on the number of silly combinations > that the randconfigs turn up. CONFIG_PM is there mostly for historical > reasons, it doesn't really mean much by itself except as a gate to other > options. I'm confused. Do you plan to retain the option to turn off PM features completely, or not? I thought that's what CONFIG_PM did today. -- Tim ============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Network Entertainment ============================= _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
