At Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:42:05 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Carlos R. Mafra <crmafra2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu Â3.Feb'11 at Â1:03:41 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > >> If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.36 regressions, please let us know > >> either and we'll add them to the list. ÂAlso, please let us know if any > >> of the entries below are invalid. > > > > I'm sorry if I'm overlooking something, but as far as I can see the regression > > reported here: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/24/457 > > > > is not in the list (update on that report: reverting that commit on top of > > 2.6.37 fixes the issue). > > Ok, added Keith and Dave to the cc, since they are the signers of that commit. > > > After some time, I also ended up finding an earlier report in the kernel bugzilla > > which I think is the same regression (it was bisected to the same commit): > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24982 > > > > but I do not see it in the list either, even though it's marked as a > > regression in the bugzilla. > > > > The issue was also present in 2.6.38-rc2 last time I tested. > > Just to confirm, can you also check -rc3? I'm pretty sure nothing has > changed, but there were a few drm patches after -rc2, so it's alsways > good to double-check. The problem I reported in the bugzilla above is still present in 2.6.38-rc3. I'm pretty sure that's the same issue as Carlos' case. thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
