Re: 2.6.38-rc3-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.36 -> 2.6.37

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu  3.Feb'11 at  1:03:41 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.36 regressions, please let us know
> either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know if any
> of the entries below are invalid.

I'm sorry if I'm overlooking something, but as far as I can see the regression
reported here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/24/457

is not in the list (update on that report: reverting that commit on top of 
2.6.37 fixes the issue).

After some time, I also ended up finding an earlier report in the kernel bugzilla
which I think is the same regression (it was bisected to the same commit):

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24982

but I do not see it in the list either, even though it's marked as a
regression in the bugzilla.

The issue was also present in 2.6.38-rc2 last time I tested.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux