Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> writes: >> For mobile devices it is not acceptable to filter events away at some >> upper SW layer depending on the system state. The HW which generates >> those events may not generate events at all to allow longer CPU sleep >> periods. > > Ok. > >> In ideal world it would be nice to control device states based on for >> example user count. However, there are several listeners for input >> devices and it is hard or impossible to have them all to follow overall >> state transition (screen blanked etc.). Instead, there is some >> system > > So you have mobile device; why is it impossible to just close the > device when you do not want the events? I guess it is hard for generic > distros, but on your phone, you should be able to modify Xserver to > close touchscreen/keypad device when it is not needed... right? We'd had this discussion before... cf. eg. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.input/9266/focus=9767 The problem was that several processes may have a device open, while another process should be able to control the state of the device. Maybe this could be solved by making the controlling process a proxy, and having all "user" processes going though it. Then the controlling (proxy) process could open/close the device as it wants, letting the runtime PM do its job. But this would mean duplicating some kernel functionality (at least multiplexing) in user space. -- Regards, Feri. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
