On Sunday, October 10, 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: ... > > > > > > It's up to userspace to make sure that the display's usage count goes > > > to 0 at the proper time, i.e., when the button is pressed. Contrary to > > > what you wrote above, we _do_ have an interface for this at the PM core > > > level: power/control. I think that power/control is not sufficient, because drivers may generally not have enough information to make a decision to suspend the device. What you're saying basically means that for every driver there should be an interface for user space to tell it when the device is not used (and therefore may be suspended), which is pretty much what I'm saying. The difference seems to be that I think it's better to put this interface into /sys/devices/.../power/, while your opinion seems to be that the interface should be driver-specific. > > > > I think that while using power/control is a _very_ good option "auto" > > and "on" are not enough, we need 3 states: "on", "off" and "auto". > > Will the driver use autosuspend for the 30-second delay? Then all you > have to do is this: When the button is pressed, write 0 to > power/autosuspend_delay_ms, causing an immediate runtime suspend. > Then before turning the display back on, write 30000 to set the delay > to 30 seconds again. You can leave power/control set to "auto" the > whole time. > > I don't like the idea of having an "off" setting in power/control. > What happens if the user turns a disk drive controller "off" and the > system needs to read or write something on that disk drive? That's why I said about a new flag that will only be set by drivers _knowing_ that they can suspend "on demand". Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
