* Arjan van de Ven (arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On 10/8/2010 1:38 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> The fundamental thing about tracing/instrumentation is that there are no >> deep ABI needs: it's all about analyzing development kernels (and a few >> select versions that get the enterprise treatment) but otherwise the >> half-life of this kind of information is very short. >> >> So we dont want to tie ourselves down with excessive ABIs. >> > > ok I'll start working on a second mechanism then to export information > that applications need ;-( > it'll look a lot like tracing I suppose ;-( What's wrong with doing the compatibility layer in a LGPL library shipped with the kernel tree under tools/ ? Why does everything *have* to be done in kernel-space ? Why are you so focused on making your application interact directly with kernel ABIs ? I'm being direct because there are trivial solutions to your problem that you are rejecting without due consideration. (and also I just had one coffee too many) ;-) Regards, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
