On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:36 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > I still don't see why you need TRACE_EVENT_ABI for that, if its the same > > name and the format can be extended you get the same results with what > > we've got. Apps need to read/parse the format thing anyway. > > Just a marker that these trace points are being used by apps. I really don't see any additional value in that. Its not like we won't change them if we have to. > But then again, we present the fields in the data. The tools should use > a parse library (which a generic one will soon be out too). This way, we > don't need them at the "end" but the parsing tools could find the fields > no matter where they are in the record. Right. They should use the full format specification. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
