* Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 17 September 2010 16:24:59 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Apropos documentation..., are the power trace events documented > > > > somewhere? > > > > > > No. We need something like Documentation/trace/events-kmem.txt. I > > > can write that with for the new power API. > > Such a patch introducing events-power.txt would be most welcome! > Better wait a bit... > As soon as it exists, things are harder to change. > As long as there isn't an API documented, there doesn't exist one > (yes we want to have perf timechart, etc. still functional/compatible, > but still, better let's do not the same mistake with some quick shots). Music to my ears ;-) I was waiting for ACPI side feedback to all this, so whatever we do it would be nice to cover ARM and x86 as well - and in a single coherent framework. [ You dont even have to document it, as good code is self-explanatory ;-) ] Thanks, Ingo _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
