On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 08/23/2010 08:58 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, August 23, 2010, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> Hello, sorry about the delay. > >> > >> On 08/19/2010 06:23 PM, Stephan Diestelhorst wrote: > >>> It says "max_performance", I have not touched anyhting. So it has been > >>> like that all the time. Would this explain why your patch did not show > >>> the debug printout? > >> > >> Hmm... okay. Yeah, if you haven't been using IPM at all, there won't > >> be any debug messages but at the same time the posted patch should > >> have had the same effect as Rafael's patch as IPM path isn't traveled > >> at all. Can you please check the followings? > >> > >> * You're actually running the correct patched kernel and modules. It > >> probably is a good idea to add a printk message. ie. Apply the > >> patch and add a printk() in ata_host_request_pm() in libata-core.c > >> and make sure the debug messages appears. > >> > >> * Rafael's patch actually fixes the problem. If you haven't been > >> using IPM at all, Rafael's patch and mine should behave exactly the > >> same (ie. no IPM operation at all during suspend/resume). It could > >> be that you're seeing a different issue. > >> > >> Rafael, can you please test my patch and see how your case behaves? > > > > This one: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/5/328 ? > > Yeap, that one. I can prep a test git branch if necessary. No need to, but it's going to take a few days to verify on my box. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
