On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Not Ubuntu, not Fedora, not MeeGo, not anyone with a typical >> >> user-space seems to be having this problem. I can argue to you that >> >> this problem can be solved in easier ways, but instead I will argue >> >> that perhaps we should wait for somebody besides Android to complain >> >> about it before providing a "solution". Because after all, what good >> >> is a "solution" provided by the kernel, if the user-space is not going >> >> to use it, ever. >> > >> > At this point in the discussion, I am quite prepared to believe that you >> > will avoid using suspend blockers, and that you will further do everything >> > in your power to prevent anyone else from using suspend blockers. ;-) >> >> I'm not tying anybody's hands. >> >> How are people using real-time linux if it's not on mainline? Well, >> duuh, you apply the patches. If say Fedora was interested on it, they >> could apply the patches, and see for themselves. People do that all >> the time, with the mm tree, with Con Koliva's patches, etc. Once >> people are happy with the results, things get merged. Why should this >> be any different? > > Because millions of users are happy -- with Android, including suspend > blockers. I explicitly said somebody besides Android, specifically, somebody with a typical linux ecosystem. You are not addressing the argument at hand, that nobody else wants to tackle the issue this way, thus only making the discussion more difficult. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
