> >> Not Ubuntu, not Fedora, not MeeGo, not anyone with a typical > >> user-space seems to be having this problem. I can argue to you that > >> this problem can be solved in easier ways, but instead I will argue > >> that perhaps we should wait for somebody besides Android to complain > >> about it before providing a "solution". Because after all, what good > >> is a "solution" provided by the kernel, if the user-space is not going > >> to use it, ever. > > > > At this point in the discussion, I am quite prepared to believe that you > > will avoid using suspend blockers, and that you will further do everything > > in your power to prevent anyone else from using suspend blockers. ;-) > > I'm not tying anybody's hands. > > How are people using real-time linux if it's not on mainline? Well, > duuh, you apply the patches. If say Fedora was interested on it, they > could apply the patches, and see for themselves. People do that all > the time, with the mm tree, with Con Koliva's patches, etc. Once > people are happy with the results, things get merged. Why should this > be any different? Because millions of users are happy -- with Android, including suspend blockers. Best, Dominik _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
