Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
From: Anca Emanuel <anca.emanuel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 02:13:00 +0300
Cc: david@xxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, swetland@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, florian@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20100804231003.GL24163@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20100801054816.GI2470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008041124580.6545@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100804185520.GA2417@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201008042251.08266.rjw@xxxxxxx> <20100804205654.GA4986@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008041529530.6545@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimRZc2B1=ic-0jrGBX7ahCu=NCoQadCOePGDmh9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008041554580.6545@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100804231003.GL24163@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

One suggestion: Get an Android Phone, test your ideas on it, then comment.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
  - From: Paul E. McKenney

References:
- Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
  - From: Paul E. McKenney
- Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
  - From: david
- Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
  - From: Matthew Garrett
- Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
  - From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
  - From: Matthew Garrett
- Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
  - From: david
- Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
  - From: Arve Hjønnevåg
- Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
  - From: david
- Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
  - From: Paul E. McKenney

Prev by Date: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.35 Regression: Ages spent discarding blocks that weren't used!
Previous by thread: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
Next by thread: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ACPI] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [CPU Freq] [Kernel Newbies] [Fedora Kernel] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]