On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 06:02:28PM -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote: > Which makes the driver and/or network stack changes identical to using > wakelocks, right? I think we're resigned to the fact that we need to indicate wakeup events in a manner that's pretty equivalent to wakelocks. The only real issue is what the API looks like. Anyone who's still talking about cgroups seems to be trying to solve a different problem. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
