Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 07:22:53AM -0700, david@xxxxxxx wrote:

> I'm not sure it's possible to completely eliminate the race, even with  
> wakelocks there is some time between the time you last check if the  
> wakelock is set and when the hardware finishes responding to your 
> commands to go to sleep (Unless you can set a level-based interrupt that 
> will wake you up as soon as you finish going to sleep)

It's typically the case that you can - we've even seen that on x86 with 
ACPI GPEs.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux