On Tuesday, June 29, 2010, mark gross wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:44:48PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > Since every caller has to squirrel away the returned pointer anyway, > > they might as well supply the memory area. This fixes a bug in a few of > > the call sites where the returned pointer was dereferenced without > > checking it for NULL (which gets returned if the kzalloc failed). > > > > I'd like to hear how sound and netdev feels about this: it will add > > about two more pointers worth of data to struct netdev and struct > > snd_pcm_substream .. but I think it's worth it. If you're OK, I'll add > > your acks and send through the pm tree. > > > > This also looks to me like an android independent clean up (even though > > it renders the request_add atomically callable). I also added include > > guards to include/linux/pm_qos_params.h > > > > cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> > Thank you for doing this!, I'll integrate it into some testing targets > in the morning! > > Signed-off-by: mark gross <markgross@xxxxxxxxxxx> I would apply this one too, but I need a final changelog for it. Care to send? Rafael _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
